As the Financial Times reported last week, Russia's foreign-reserves decline signaled the market was more nervous about investing in the region since the recent war in Georgia. As tensions with the West grew more strained by Russia's objection to the U.S. placing a missile defense in Poland, I have to add to the list of Russia's objections at Georgia's desire for NATO membership. We now have a situation that may appear to be calming on the surface, but underneath it's anything but calm.
On the subject of the reconstruction for Georgia in the aftermath of war, G7 finance ministers issued a "ready to support" statement while the U.S. Treasury released a statement, speaking in its role as a G7 member, that the U.S. is ready to help Georgia "maintain confidence in Georgia's financial system and support economic reconstruction."
There are clear winners and losers in every battle, and that goes for following the conflicts, too. I'm well aware of how the World Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Asian Development Bank and other global-reaching investment concerns will lead the European Commission to the conclusion that Georgia's reconstruction is of vital importance for future economic growth of Central Europe and beyond, but everyone is still at the damage-assessment stage. The battle-torn nation's infrastructure -- from roadways to railways -- is badly bruised. Let's not forget the people of South Ossetia and Georgia displaced by the war.
Do such geopolitical concerns play a factor in oil price increases, when even a 1% drop in the Caspian oil supply causes concern among traders and investors? British Petroleum (BP) exported that 1% of oil until the operation ground came to a stop due to the fighting in Georgia but also because of a fire on the BTC line, caused possibly by Russian troops. As the investments director of Seven Investment Management put it, "Investors are realizing that the bear has put its paw on the pipeline and geopolitical risk is likely to remain a theme for the next month or so."
Russia has also seen foreign investment fall as investors become more nervous following the war. Mutual funds in Russia, Russian investment funds and Russian stocks have all slid (as if oil-greased) on news of a plan to import large volumes of Central Asian oil into Central Europe while Georgia undergoes reconstruction. These and much more are all of the factors that I'm considering as I assess the scope of Georgian reconstruction while keeping my eye on the threat of another war erupting.
Georgian reconstruction isn't just about rebuilding a civilian nation...
What does Georgian reconstruction mean to investors in the future, besides fixing roads and railroad lines? Since Russian marines captured Georgia's main port, Poti, during the first week of the war, they sunk Georgia's entire navy in the Black Sea and in some of its ports, and then demolished what was left of it.
Military infrastructure is one area not always considered by the G7, the World Bank and others. Surely, NATO membership requires a standing army, navy and reserves among the civilian population. Despite the idea of Russian military power being superior to her neighbors, a plan to rebuild Georgia's military will be part of any progress in Georgia. Now that Moscow has withdrawn most of its forces from most parts of Georgia by the end of last week, Russians still remain in Georgia even as U.S. humanitarian aid ships, in defying Russia, also remain there.
I'm investigating what Central European issues benefit from both military and industrial reconstruction, and when I have a strong sense of where the smart money should go, I'll let my subscribers know about it.
The White House said Monday that Russia "continues to defy international calls" to pull its forces out of Georgia. In fact, even as Russian forces continue to carry out patrols in Poti, a U.S. destroyer is reportedly on its way there in a move that might accelerate the region's tension and ignite another conflict. It's doubtful a Naval destroyer is carrying civilian humanitarian aid and whether its a part of a larger battle group. Neither the White House nor the Pentagon has acknowledged this AP story.
If you're not party to this war, or directly supplying or fighting in it, you may wonder what it all means to you, the global investor. Aside from the tedious but important details of what is unfolding in a region where you may or may not commit your money, the smart investor sees where the money will be spent for both areas of reconstruction we've discussed here.
The proper understanding of the context, and the shifting fortunes of war (especially following the hostilities) informs your global investment strategy and, consequently, your own fortunes in the region. I'll get down to specifics once my analysis includes all relevant factors and adds up to the kind of recos you need in a hostile world.
Best wishes,
Jeff Manera
G3 Global Options,
Emerging Markets Insider
Email: Jmanera@EmergingMarketsInsider.net